EyesOnDeck vs UserTesting
Real people, pay per test.
UserTesting is the incumbent — a large tester panel behind an annual subscription. EyesOnDeck is a smaller, sharper alternative: a real mix of everyday reviewers going through your site or app, priced per test.
| Feature | EyesOnDeck | UserTesting |
|---|---|---|
| Reviewer pool | Real mix of everyday people | Large professional tester panel |
| Pay per test | No subscription — quote per project | Annual subscription tiers |
| Mix formats in one campaign | Video + screenshots + written | Choose one format |
| Minimum contract | None — single test is fine | Annual commitment for full access |
| Design specialty filters | Filter by mobile / e-commerce / SaaS | Persona / demographic filters |
| Enterprise recording panel | Not our focus | Deep panel with recruit-your-own |
Choose UserTesting when…
You need a large, recorded panel at enterprise scale, deep persona-matching, and are comfortable with annual pricing. It's the right tool for research teams running dozens of concurrent studies.
Choose EyesOnDeck when…
You want a product reviewer's eye on your product — one test at a time, no subscription, mixed formats. Ideal for indie makers, product teams, and design-led startups shipping a site, store, or app.
Get a reviewer critique on your product.
Tell us what to review — we'll send a scoped quote in days.
Request a quote