EyesOnDeck vs Maze
Designer eyes, not just a heatmap.
Maze is great for unmoderated prototype validation — click paths, heatmaps, task completion rates. EyesOnDeck is the opposite side of the coin: a real person reviewing your live product and telling you what's wrong in plain language.
| Feature | EyesOnDeck | Maze |
|---|---|---|
| What you're testing | Live sites, stores, apps | Prototypes (Figma) + live URLs |
| Who runs the test | A real person — everyday reviewer | Random panel or your own recruits |
| Test style | Human review + written critique | Unmoderated, task-based |
| Best for | First-impression + design critique | Quantitative flow validation |
| Output formats | Video, screenshots, written — mixed | Recordings + heatmaps + metrics |
| Prototype heatmaps | Not our focus | Core feature |
Choose Maze when…
You have a Figma prototype and want quantitative signal — task success rates, click paths, heatmaps — from a large panel. Great for validating flows before you ship.
Choose EyesOnDeck when…
You've shipped, or you're about to, and you want a real reviewer's opinion on what's actually broken — not a bar chart. Video, screenshots, and written critique from real people.
Ready for a reviewer's eyes on your product?
Send us the scope — we'll reply with a quote in days.
Request a quote