EyesOnDeck vs Maze
Designer eyes, not just a heatmap.
Maze is great for unmoderated prototype validation — click paths, heatmaps, task completion rates. EyesOnDeck is the opposite side of the coin: a working UI/UX designer reviewing your live product and telling you what's wrong in plain language.
| Feature | EyesOnDeck | Maze |
|---|---|---|
| What you're testing | Live sites, stores, apps | Prototypes (Figma) + live URLs |
| Who runs the test | Working UI/UX designer | Random panel or your own recruits |
| Test style | Moderated review + critique | Unmoderated, task-based |
| Best for | First-impression + design critique | Quantitative flow validation |
| Written & video output | Yes — mixed in one campaign | Recordings + heatmaps + metrics |
| Prototype heatmaps | Not our focus | Core feature |
Choose Maze when…
You have a Figma prototype and want quantitative signal — task success rates, click paths, heatmaps — from a large panel. Great for validating flows before you ship.
Choose EyesOnDeck when…
You've shipped, or are about to, and you want a designer's opinion on what's actually broken — not a bar chart. Video, screenshots, and written critique from a real UI/UX professional.
Ready for a designer's eyes on your product?
Send us the scope — we'll reply with a quote in days.
Request a quote